

He started by arguing that the first basic human rights is to be free. In one-party states, the party decides what is right and wrong, it decides for the citizens. The problem is therefore a problem of the system. The objectives of the coup were to dialog with the citizens (and the international community) and to generate a consensus. The main pillars were good governance, justice and democracy. Thus, the system would change from a regime of proposition (the one-party state makes prososals, rubber-stamped by the electorate) to a regime of choices. The result was that after 19 months in power, the transitory military regime handed over the executive powers to a democratically elected president. This new government has legitimacy, there are various political parties represented in Parliament, there is press freedom.
In conclusion, Mauritania must succeed. Indeed, in the region and for Arab countries, it offers an alternative, an exit solution to the various dictatorial regimes.